See potential value
What a better decision is worth
Adjust the assumptions to explore what improvement could be worth for your organization. No account needed — scenarios are estimates from your own inputs, never promises.
Executive & Critical-Hire Assessment — the economics of a better hiring decision
Every figure below recalculates from the same formula as you move an assumption.
Assumptions: illustrative exampleBaseline modeled exposure
$100,000
Modeled avoided cost
$20,000
Net modeled value
$15,500
Break-even improvement
4.5%
Your assumption — no benchmark is implied.
Relative, not percentage points.
Where does the value come from?
Baseline-to-decision waterfall
Source: Your inputs · modeled
Which assumption matters most?
Sensitivity (each input ±20%)
Source: Your inputs · modeled
How robust is the case?
Three scenarios
Conservative uses half your improvement assumption; high-impact uses 1.5× (capped at 100%). Same formula throughout.
Source: Your inputs · modeled
What would need to be true?
Break-even explorer
Break-even needs a of 4.5% — an unsuccessful-hire rate of 23.9%. Your assumption: 20%.
Source: Your inputs · modeled
When could value appear?
Decision value timeline (months 0–12)
Source: Your inputs · modeled
Modeled business exposure from your assumptions — not a guarantee, benchmark, or candidate-level prediction. Relative improvement is your assumption. KEEN SIX never ranks candidates or issues hiring decisions.